|
|
|

|
By
Charles Staley, B.Sc, MSS
Director, Staley Training Systems |
|
Recently, I questioned the obsession
most Americans have with aerobic exercise particularly
when done for the purpose of improving physical appearance
(which, of course, is why 99.5% of all people exercise in
the first place). This article prompted several letters and
phone calls, most of which were critical. Therefore, I'd like
to clarify my position in this article.
|
 |
Obviously, compared to a sedentary
lifestyle, aerobic exercise is quite beneficial. The people I'm
trying to reach with this message are those individuals who are
not competitive aerobic athletes, but who nevertheless spend between
5 and 10 hours a week in the aerobic zone, for the purpose of improving
their appearance. These individuals (and there are legions of them)
would benefit by reducing their volume of aerobic exercise, and
incorporating resistance training into their program.
Even aerobics instructors have intuitively
known this for quite some time. Every time I walk past an "aerobics"
class in a health club, or if I happen upon one on TV, they're lifting
weights. Small ones, of course they need to guard against
gaining too much muscle. Funny how most men have a tremendously
difficult time gaining muscle, despite grueling weight lifting programs,
while women claim that they grow like weeds just thinking about
lifting! Why is this?
One of my "detractors' wrote
that (I paraphrase) beginners can benefit from 30 minutes of brisk
walking, for which they need no instruction. I couldn't agree more.
But walking is a VERY beginning form of exercise. In fact, I consider
walking a form of locomotion, not exercise. When the simplest of
life's requirements, such as walking, climbing stairs, and carrying
groceries are exercise, I'd say you're in pathetic (perhaps pathologic)
shape. In this case, walking is in fact an ideal form of exercise.
Once you get beyond this point, however,
more strenuous forms of activity should be explored, in order to
respect the principle of progressive overload (i.e., "If you
keep doing what you've always done, you'll keep getting what you've
always gotten.")
Resistance training does have a few
down-sides, depending on your perspective. It does require a certain
amount of supervision, at least in the beginning. And of course,
it demands hard, physical work, which most people disdain. Info-mercial
companies know this well selling their exercise gimmicks with
phrases like "You can do it while you watch TV," and "It
only takes 10 minutes a day!"
Regardless of what your exercise regime
consists of, your success will largely depend upon the degree to
which you really enjoy exercising. You do best what
you do most, and you do most what you enjoy doing. How many times
have you heard this exchange in your health club?: "Hey Bob
how's it 'goin?" "Well, it'll be goin better when I get
outta here!" In my experience, Bob is very unlikely to make
progress, unless he can find a way to enjoy and appreciate physical
activity.
What the Research Literature Has to Say About
Strength Versus Aerobic Exercise
From Pollack, in the Southern Medical
Journal, Volume 87, No. 5, 588
- Low levels of aerobics yield the
same health benefits as higher levels
- Master runners show a 2kg. average
LBM loss
- Higher intensity resistive training
may be necessary for a large percentage of the healthy elderly
population.
From Ketelhut, in American Heart
Journal, 127 (3): 567-71, March, 1994
"We conclude that the gradual
decrease in arterial pressure seen with prolonged aerobic exercise
(60 min.) is the result of a fall in cardiac pump function (as measured
by cardiac output, ejection fraction, fractional fiber shortenings
and contractility index), possibly indicating cardiac fatigue."
From Todd, in Sports Medicine,
14(4): 243-59, October, 1992
- Circuit weight training has been
shown to improve aerobic endurance and muscle strength and to
have additional benefits of improved treadmill time compared with
traditional aerobics programs.
From Boyden, in Archives of Internal
Medicine, 153(1):97-100, January 11, 1993
- In healthy pre-menopausal women
with normal baseline lipids, 5 months of resistive exercise training
reduced) total CHO and the LDL fraction.
|
|
From Campbell, in American
Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 60(2): 167-175, August, 1994
- Resistance training is
an effective way to increase energy requirements, decrease
body fat mass, and maintain metabolically active tissue
mass in healthy older people and may be useful in weight
control.
From McCartney, et al:,
in American Journal of Cardiology, May, 1991
- There is a much better
adaptation to life activity with weight training.
From Thomas, in Southern
Medical Journal, Vol. 87, No. 5
- "Because of the correlation
between bone mass and muscle mass, an increase in muscle
mass is a desired effect of exercise."
|
|
|
|
Got a Website, Blog
or Newsletter?
CLICK HERE to learn how you can republish
Charles Staley's
articles on your site for free!
|
 |
|


About The Author
|
His colleagues call him an iconoclast,
a visionary, a rule-breaker. His clients call him The
Secret Weapon for his ability to see what other coaches
miss. Charles calls himself a geek who struggled
in Phys Ed throughout school. Whatever you call him, Charles
methods are ahead of their time and quickly produce serious
results. His counter-intuitive approach and self-effacing
demeanor have lead to appearances on NBCs The TODAY
Show and The CBS Early Show.
Currently, Charles competes
in Olympic-style weightlifting on the masters circuit,
with a 3-year goal of qualifying for the 2009 Masters
World Championships.

|
|
Learn More
About
EDT Training!
You can build
muscle and strength and burn fat in as little as 15 minutes,
3 times a week with EDT...it works for EVERYONE
- male, female, young, old...your body simply has no choice
but to get results!
Click
here to learn more
and get your copy today!
 |
|
|